Free Meals in Schools
Last year, a program that provided universal free meals to students during the COVID-19 pandemic expired. Between 2020 and 2021, the program reduced child hunger by over 2%, and in 2022, 80 million more meals were served by schools than in the year before the pandemic. As the cost of school meals returns, so does meal debt. Students who are unable to afford school meals will often not be denied food. Instead, the school will keep track of their "debt," and sometimes use tactics such as serving students in debt lower-quality meals in order to pressure families to pay. Currently, students in the U.S. owe a total of around $19 million in meal debt. While students may qualify for free or reduced meals, in some areas the percentage of students who do has dropped since before the pandemic. When the pandemic-era program expired, the threshold for getting free food was around 130% of the poverty line. In addition, the process to apply for free and reduced meals can be complex and act as an obstacle for families who might qualify. The sudden expiration of the free meal program exacerbated the issue, as some families were not aware they had to re-apply.
This issue has been brought to the fore again in the last week when Representatives Omar, McGovern, and Moore, and Senators Sanders, Gillibrand, and Heinrich, introduced the Universal School Meals Program Act of 2023. The legislation proposes free breakfast, lunch, dinner, and a snack for all students from preschool through high school, including in the summer. It also incentivizes schools to use local ingredients and foods, as well as increasing funding to child and adult care facilities that provide meals. Finally, the bill would reimburse schools' meal debt and stop the pressure tactics used in debt collection.
I fully support free meals in schools for students, regardless of income level. First of all, I think it is a basic social justice issue: children (and all people) have the right to proper nutrition. Especially schools, which are meant to foster kids' growth and in which kids are required to spend a significant portion of their life, have a responsibility for their children's well-being. Not only is food security a health concern, but students also perform better academically on a full stomach. If we're not spending our money on food for children, what are we possibly spending it on? As Rep. McGovern said, "In the richest country in the history of the world, every child that does not have enough to eat is a policy failure and a moral outrage."
Comments
Post a Comment